This is The Takeaway from today’s Morning Brief, which you can sign up to receive in your inbox every morning along with:

  • The Chart of the Day

  • What we’re watching

  • What we’re reading

  • Economic data releases and earnings

Google can thank OpenAI for its big win in court.

After a federal judge ruled that Google wouldn’t be forced to sell its Chrome browser — avoiding the harshest potential remedies in a landmark antitrust case — shares of the search giant surged by almost double digits.

What a relief for Google and its investors: They’ve been weighed down by the uncertainty of the pending decision for months. And now the company can move forward after prevailing over antitrust prosecutors set on reining in Big Tech’s power.

But the court’s ruling placed Google’s strange relationship with generative AI on full display, highlighting what amounts to a double-edged sword for the company amid the new tech.

Popular AI-powered chatbots, which perform like more intuitive, capable, and far-reaching search engines, are threatening to displace Google’s legacy search experience. They pose significant and unwelcome competition in a way that Bing has simply not.

But perhaps not entirely unwelcome. The competition’s dramatic arrival meant two things: billions of dollars flowing into their operations and a legal lifeline for Google, providing a defense against monopoly accusations.

The judge, Amit P. Mehta, did not mince words, writing, “The emergence of GenAI changed the course of this case.”

Google is still the dominant player in search. But AI technology has the potential to radically transform the landscape.

“Today, tens of millions of people use GenAI chatbots, like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude, to gather information that they previously sought through internet search,” Mehta wrote. “These GenAI chatbots are not yet close to replacing [general search engines], but the industry expects that developers will continue to add features to GenAI products to perform more like GSEs.”

To Google’s credit, it understands the risk GenAI poses to its core business and has its own, Gemini, backed by its own search might.

And now, in the context of a competitive marketplace, it’s harder to justify harsh restrictions on Google. The rising popularity and investment interest in AI companies means there are, or will be, clear alternatives to Google’s search empire. Thus, tougher antitrust remedies placed on Google would also limit its ability to compete with AI upstarts in the nascent arena of AI-infused answer engines.

“These new realities give the court hope that Google will not simply outbid competitors for distribution if superior products emerge,” Mehta wrote. “It also weighs in favor of ‘caution’ before disadvantaging Google in this highly competitive space.”

We’ve heard this argument before, though not from the powers that be.

Eddy Cue, Apple’s services chief, made similar arguments when he testified earlier this year, downplaying the importance of a lucrative search partnership with Google and saying that AI providers will ultimately become search engine alternatives.

As you might guess, that makes Apple another winner in the aftermath of the court ruling. Google won’t be forced to end its deal to be the default search engine for Apple’s Safari browser. Shares of Apple rose around 3%.

OpenAI and its conceptual peers managed to become an existential threat to Google and the paradigm of search, thereby serving as a justification for preventing its monopoly from being broken up.

Truly a twist ending ChatGPT could not have written.

Hamza Shaban is a reporter for Yahoo Finance covering markets and the economy. Follow Hamza on X @hshaban.

morning brief image
morning brief image

Click here for the latest technology news that will impact the stock market

Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance

Terms and Privacy Policy